• Contributors
    • Catherine L. Tully, Owner/Editor
    • Dance Writers
      • Rachel Hellwig, Assistant Editor — Dance
      • Jessika Anspach McEliece, Contributor — Dance
      • Janice Barringer, Contributor – Dance
      • José Pablo Castro Cuevas, Contributor — Dance
      • Katie C. Sopoci Drake, Contributor – Dance
      • Ashley Ellis, Contributor — Dance
      • Samantha Hope Galler, Contributor – Dance
      • Cara Marie Gary, Contributor – Dance
      • Luis Eduardo Gonzalez, Contributor — Dance
      • Karen Musey, Contributor – Dance
      • Janet Rothwell (Neidhardt), Contributor — Dance
      • Matt de la Peña, Contributor – Dance
      • Lucy Vurusic Riner, Contributor – Dance
      • Alessa Rogers, Contributor — Dance
      • Emma Love Suddarth, Contributor — Dance
      • Andrea Thompson, Contributor – Dance
      • Sally Turkel, Contributor — Dance
      • Lauren Warnecke, Contributor – Dance
      • Sharon Wehner, Contributor – Dance
      • Ashley Werhun, Contributor — Dance
      • Dr. Frank Sinkoe, Contributor – Podiatry
      • Jessica Wilson, Assistant Editor – Dance
    • Dance Wellness Panel
      • Jan Dunn, MS, Editor
      • Gigi Berardi, PhD
      • James Garrick, MD
      • Robin Kish, MS, MFA
      • Moira McCormack, MS
      • Janice G. Plastino, PhD
      • Emma Redding, PhD
      • Erin Sanchez, MS
      • Selina Shah, MD, FACP
      • Nancy Wozny
      • Matthew Wyon, PhD
    • Music & Dance Writers
      • Scott Speck, Contributor – Music
    • Interns
      • Intern Wanted For 4dancers
    • Contact
  • About
    • About 4dancers
    • Advertise With 4dancers
    • Product Reviews on 4dancers
    • Disclosure
  • Contact

4dancers.org

A website for dancers, dance teachers and others interested in dance

Follow Us on Social!

Visit Us On YoutubeVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On PinterestVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Instagram
  • 4dancers
    • Adult Ballet
    • Career
    • Auditions
    • Competition
    • Summer Intensives
    • Pointe Shoes & Footwear
      • Breaking In Shoes
      • Freed
      • Pointe Shoe Products
      • Vegan Ballet Slippers
      • Other Footwear
  • 4teachers
    • Teaching Tips
    • Dance History
    • Dance In The US
    • Studios
  • Choreography
  • Dance Wellness
    • Conditioning And Training
    • Foot Care
    • Injuries
    • Nutrition
      • Recipes/Snacks
  • Dance Resources
    • Dance Conferences
    • Dance Products
      • Books & Magazines
      • DVDs
      • Dance Clothing & Shoes
      • Dance Gifts
      • Flamenco & Spanish Dance
      • Product Reviews
    • Social Media
  • Editorial
    • Interviews
      • 10 Questions With…
      • Dance Blog Spotlight
      • Post Curtain Chat
      • Student Spotlight
    • Dance in the UK
    • Finding Balance
    • Musings
    • One Dancer’s Journey
    • Pas de Trois
    • SYTYCD
    • The Business Of Dance
    • Finis
  • Music & Dance
    • CD/Music Reviews

Pairing Up

July 10, 2011 by Kimberly Peterson

Art forms are always political in what they choose to explore and what they don’t. Even the lack of making an active choice – is still a choice. Bodies especially, carry this weight of political choice because it is difficult, I would argue impossible, to separate the actions and emotions of a performance from the physical body in performance. In this way, the bodies you use are indeed political statements, the movement itself is a political statement, and the genders of the bodies you use are also political.

One of my biggest disappointments with the format of SYTYCD is the idea of Male/Female partnerships. While I understand that many styles are often best served with Male/Female partnerships in smaller groups and that the format of duet story-lines tends to revolve around relationships, there are several disconcerting connotations with this kind of coupling.

First, it’s very heterosexually oriented – excluding other kinds of relationships and sexualities. Secondly, it’s very gender normative – in that the roles of traditional “men” and “women” are reinforced through story, movement and the comments of judges. Finally, it’s limiting – not only in scope, but it limits the voters’ choices, it limits the choreographers, and it limits the audiences’ comprehension of dance as an art form. [Read more…]

Filed Under: 4dancers, 4teachers, Editorial, SYTYCD Tagged With: duets, kimberly peterson, So You Think You Can Dance, sytycd

So, You Think You Can Critique?

June 25, 2011 by Kimberly Peterson

Today we’ve got Kimberly Peterson back with her thoughts on So You Think You Can Dance (SYTYCD)…..

A teacher I had in college once told me that no one creates or performs a dance thinking it will be awful. No matter the outcome, they always begin with the idea of creating a great dance. There is always something, even a small thing, in that work that is valuable. When critiquing a piece, it is important to try to find the value they see in it and harness your critique to that end. Through my education and into my professional life, I’ve held that notion close.

In the book Dancers Talking Dance, Larry Lavender approaches dance critique through his use of ORDER:

Observation – one carefully and consciously sees or attends to the work of art.
Reflection –viewers describe and analyze the aesthetic object or experience.
Discussion – share reflective notes, formulate and discuss interpretations of the meaning and significance of the dance.
Evaluation – judgments are articulated and debated.
Recommendations/Revision – recommend how the work could be reshaped, assess revised dance.

(Lavender,2)

While lately, I’ve been overjoyed with the caliber of performance and the quality of the works presented, I’ve been left more than a little disappointed by the lack of quality feedback and critique offered to the dancers competing, as well as to the audience both in studio and at home.

The show, while built on drama and entertainment, is also a beacon for the dance world – inviting millions of weekly viewers into the performance and choreographic process, as well as providing them an outlet to speak of dance, to learn about dance and to educate themselves aesthetically.

It’s clear the show is aware of its broad influence with the Dizzy Feet Foundation, the boards who regularly discuss the finer points of the dances/dancers, their work with the White House for National Dance Day as well as the public’s shift in popularity of genres. Which is why I find it so odd that the dialogue from the judges is often very poor, focusing on a dancer’s story or appearance. Worse still, the criticism can completely dissolve into loud noises or fall back on preconceived assumptions. I’ll give you a few recent examples:

Dance performance and focusing on the Story
Marko Germar’s fantastic performance of Travis Wall’s contemporary statue piece was stunted by the response from Nigel that he worries about him because of the bullet lodged in his shoulder. Really Nigel? You worry about an injury he sustained a while ago, has been working through, is cleared by doctors? You worry about that in the middle of the performance?

This focus on his injury takes the focus off the dance itself – instead of turning the focus onto his performance in the work, not with his injury – but despite it. Regardless of their body’s condition, which is likely to get pretty rough towards the end of this competition, the idea is that they continue to excel. How can the judges expect this kind of rigor and then sabotage it with their dialogue? Comments like this give the dancers nothing to work with, they don’t further the comprehension of the dance work, and they don’t direct the dialogue towards the performance at hand – but rather tangential stories with no relationship to the work.

Dance performance and focusing on the Body
Auditions revealed, as they always do, how the judges deal with difference. Santa krumper was a prime example of a dancer they found to be unattractive – not desirable. However, he had technique, he had a character, he had a great personality and he did perform the movement well. Now was he right for the show, no. He was limited in scope, not likely to do well with choreography and they were right to send him home. But the dialogue during their critique – specifically the screams of disgust by Mary during his audition is more than simply not constructive, it’s unprofessional.

There was no discussion about his technique or his character or personality – it was a patronizing glossing over of a situation that they were either unwilling or unable to deal with. This lack of dialogue does a great disservice to the changing role of the body in dance, the politics of a body in motion, and the cultural shifts happening towards dancers and ability.

Dance performance and focusing on Assumptions
In a similar vein, the critique and even the support of dancers of difference can be just as patronizing, and just as destructive to discourse, as outright dismissal. This was made very clear during the audition and resulting Vegas week for Natalia, Top 20 Sasha’s sister.

While the judges were overall accepting of her dancing and performance, it was always done with the notion that they were astonished that she could move that well – you know, being big and all. The comments from Nigel, while seeming to be accepting, were often double edged. Comments such as “you’ve got a lot more to move out there than the other girls” or “you obviously don’t have the ideal physique” but then always quick to add, that he was impressed with her ability.

There was no real discussion with her that didn’t focus on the judges assumptions being smashed. There was no treating her like any other dancer, it was always the assumption first followed by their continued astonishment that she could do the same choreography at a similar caliber.

To be fair, I think they made the right decision to not put her on the show. She was very good and I think she should try again next year after working a bit more on her performance and some technical skills. But she wasn’t quite at the caliber of the other dancers chosen for the Top 20 this year. The competition was extremely tough, specifically with the ladies.

But while they encourage her to continue to knock down barriers, knock down walls, they themselves keep those same walls up. And instead of treating her as you would any professional dancer, they once again focus on their own assumptions instead of critiquing the dance/dancer at hand.

Dance performance and focusing on Experience
Mary’s screaming is a cop out – plain and simple. While it expresses her joy in the experience, it communicates nothing else. Her screams and over-exuberance are little more than a giant red flag for “I have nothing valuable to contribute”.

Even with Iveta, she doesn’t use her technical expertise to contribute to the dialogue about the styles, but instead dissolves the discussion into screaming matches. This happened three times in the course of the first 20 performers: Miranda & Robert, Missy & Wadi, Iveta & Nick. About one in every three performances.

Name Dropping
And what is with all the name dropping? Nearly every other word from Nigel or Mary was a choreographer, a project, a personal memory about the style’s evolution…half the limited critique space was devoted to nothing more than commercial filler. Very disappointing.

Truthfully, the commentary from Megan Mullany during the first week of the show was stellar in my opinion. Not only was she very on point, she often drove the discussion forward and elevated the dialogue. I often feel like the judges play to only Observation, Reflection and some Discussion while completely ignoring the Evaluation or Recommendation aspects.

Further, this lack of a critical eye and proper evaluation was made clear in the decision by the judges to not eliminate two dancers after the first week of voting. It highlighted the lack of critique, the focus on the dancers’ stories, their own experiences, and their own expectations in place of honest evaluation.

I certainly hope that we see more of a critical eye, more honest evaluation, as the show continues because the dialogue is so important to the dancers, their audience’s aesthetic education and pushing the field of dance as a whole.

Critique is very important for a number of reasons. It helps shape dialogue by which people speak about the art-form. It trains people to look beyond their initial reactions to discover why it is they enjoy what they do and what specifically it is that they enjoy. It not only takes the pulse of the culture and its relationship to the art-form, but it helps shape it. To give the audience great dance performances is only half the battle at best, if the dialogue isn’t set in the right direction.

Kimberly Peterson

Contributor Kimberly Peterson is a transplant to Minneapolis from the Dallas/Ft. Worth area. She has received her Bachelors and Masters of Arts degrees from Texas Woman’s University’s prestigious dance program.

Her graduate research entitled: B-Sides: Independent Record Labels and the Representation of Dancers explored the parallels between the independent music industry and current methods of dancer representation. This research has produced a vision of a for-profit system of representation for the arts based largely on the institutional structures of independent record labels, for profit businesses, and the unique atmosphere of her time at Texas Woman’s University. This research is still developing and Kimberly continues to develop her research for future presentation and publication.

She has taught as a substitute teacher for Denton Dance Conservatory, a pilot after-school program with the Greater Denton Arts Council, a master class series with Dance Fusion and a number of personally choreographed works. She has also served from 2000-2004 as the assistant to the coordinator of KidsDance: Rhythms for Life – a lecture demonstration on the principles of dance to area second graders that is now in its 11th season.

Drawing on her experience with producing dance works, Kimberly has served as a lighting designer, stage manager, event coordinator, volunteer and as an advisor in various roles: most recently RedEye Theatre, The Soap Factory, Minnesota Fringe Festival and MNPR’s Rock the Garden in collaboration with the Walker Arts Center.

She was also a featured choreographer, representing her university at the American College Dance Festival Association’s South Central Region’s informal concert series in 2002. Her work has been commissioned by Tarrant County College in 2006 and has been set upon Zenon Dance Studio’s scholarship dancers as a featured choreographer in 2010.

Filed Under: 4dancers, 4teachers, Editorial, SYTYCD Tagged With: critique, krumping, marko germar, megan mullany, So You Think You Can Dance, sytycd, travis wall

The Sweet Spot

June 11, 2011 by Kimberly Peterson

Today I’d like to introduce 4dancers newest contributor, who will be writing about “So You Think You Can Dance”, among other things. Read more about Kimberly Peterson’s background in her bio at the end of this post, and be sure and chime in if you have something to add to what she has said here. I’m thrilled to have her aboard…

You’ll find her writing to be more than a mere “re-hash” of the show, but rather a closer look at some of the deeper issues that are raised by it. Read on…   – Catherine

Many dancers have been told of the illusive “sweet spot”, wherein very nearly all aspects of technique, movement elements and principles are present in a singular body.

This perfectly technical and yet expressive dancer is also inherently malleable, utilized simultaneously as both tool and material, from which a choreographer can construct their vision. It’s the purpose of the show, So You Think You Can Dance, to find a dancer who has found this illusive “sweet spot”.

While specializing in one particular genre, each dancer is tested and pushed to the limit in any number of genres from the highly classical and technical, to the guttural nature of street dance and every point in between. As the season gets underway, the audition process reveals much about the connections between genres, technique, performance and this “sweet spot”.

Watching the audition process and looking back over the previous seasons, there seems to be a clear pattern between the style of dance a dancer specializes in and the probability of getting straight through to Vegas vs. the choreography round. While open and aware of the trends and upcoming genres, it appears that certain styles do seem to lend themselves better than others to success in both the audition round as well as future success on the show. [Read more…]

Filed Under: 4dancers, 4teachers, Editorial, SYTYCD Tagged With: choreography, dancers, kimberly peterson, So You Think You Can Dance, sweet spot, sytycd

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Dance Artwork

Get Your Dance Career Info Here!

Dance ebook cover

Podcast

Disclosure – Affiliate & Ad Info

This site sometimes features advertising, affiliate marketing, or affiliate links, such as Amazon Associate links and others. When you click on these links, we get a small sum that helps to support the website operations. Thank you! There’s more detailed information on ads and our disclosure policy under the About tab in our navigation at the top of the site. We clearly mark any and all posts that contain these features.

Copyright Notice

Please note that all of the content on 4dancers.org is copyrighted. Do not copy, utilize, or distribute without express permission. We take cases of infringement seriously. All rights reserved ©2022.

Copyright © 2025 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in